Yes, “the spooks” (NSA, etc.) fund a lot of spookytechnology. The control and ability needed
to construct a large quantum computer device is the extreme example of quantum technology engineering based on the spooky properties of the quantum world.
Charles Tahan, of the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University, has declared the beginning of a sexy new era in emerging quantum science: new technologies based on the exotic properties of quantum mechanics, like quantum entanglement.
Tahan proposes that a new "public-friendly" name be given to the application of weird and counter intuitive aspects of quantum theory:
"SPOOKYTECHNOLOGY"
"Spookytechnology" encompasses all functional devices, systems, and materials whose utility relies in whole or in part on higher order quantum properties of matter and energy that have no counterpart in the classical world. These purely quantum traits may include superposition, entanglement, decoherence (along with the quantum aspects of measurement and error correction) or new behavior that emerges in engineered quantum many-body systems.
The king of spooky quantumness is quantum entanglement. As physicists define it, “entanglement” refers to a peculiar quality of the known universe whereby quantum objects in certain situations cannot be described separately, even though they may be separated in space. In other words, if an atom in London is entangled with an atom in Tokyo, they are still one quantum system, which can only be understood together. Entanglement is a multi-object generalization of quantum superposition, another astounding quantum trait, where a particle can exist in two states at once (here and there, up and down). Both properties have been
experimentally confirmed.
The spooky side of Quantum Mechanics has been invoked countless times to explain everything from consciousness (Penrose-Hameroff theory) to some of the strangest of the weirdness reported in the paranormal world.
Tahan points out this is NOT his intention, but appears to be a realist who accepts that quantum mysticism is here to stay:
We don’t necessarily want a word that creates crazy speculation or adds to the ignorance
of the general population. But quantum already does this. In general, more interest is better than less. If spookytechnology better invites the question: “What is that?,” than it has more educational value.
We couldn't agree more. If we somehow manage to survive the 21st Century, it's going to be "spookytechnology" from here on out.
If you want to have a look at Tahan's short paper, you will find it here.
